Monday, April 30, 2007

Cultural Crusaders

The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.
(Romans 2:24 – ESV)

In the Christian world today some leaders have an undying passion, but it is the wrong order of things. They have a passion for the temporal results of Jesus put before the eternal relationship with Jesus. What we are taking about are those Christians who are on a moral crusade, out to fulfill some so called cultural mandate, seeing it as part of, and by extension coming before the Great Commission. They want to reclaim the city, town, or country for Christ. They don’t realize that it starts one heart at a time. We could have the most moral society we can imagine, and all its citizens on the road to hell.

We ought to have a passion for the lost, which results in a moral and ethical society, rather than a passion for a moral and ethical society, which results in a passion against the lost. This doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t use our votes to try and change the political landscape; it means that we need to be realistic, and spiritually minded as to what ultimately are the most important things. What is more important, the Ten Commandments and prayer in schools, or going out and witnessing to someone, and living the gospel yourself? Yes, we need to preach sin, judgment, hell, and all that, and this is indeed what Paul is doing, but amidst the bad news, we must also give the good news of the gospel, which is where Paul started and where Paul is headed.

Yes, Paul sure does spend a lot of time on why we are all so bad, but he will spend much more time on why Christ is so good. You know, don’t you just get sick and tired of people who point out all the problems of society but don’t give any answers they just blame “the other guy”? Well that is what Paul is saying not to do, don’t be like these Jews and moralists, and those like them today that just point out the evil, point them to the good, and it isn’t you, it is Jesus. Lets not be like the rest of the world, lets not just point at the problem without offering a solution, and the ultimate solution, and indeed, the only solution for your salvation is Jesus Christ.

As Christians we are often the same way they were. Trying to change society without changing men’s hearts is hypocrisy. Most just talk about how good we are and how bad society is, or just talk about how bad society is, which is still implying the same thing, that we are not. Well what do you expect them to do, they may have common grace, so it is not as bad as it could be, but they do not have saving grace, they are not regenerated, they are not born again, and that is what they need. We don’t need reformation we need transformation. Efforts at social harmony should not neglect the importance of changing human hearts. Trying to change society without renewing our own minds is hypocrisy as well. Don’t fool yourself.


9 comments:

Craver Vii said...

We ought to have a passion for the lost, which results in a moral and ethical society, rather than a passion for a moral and ethical society, which results in a passion against the lost.

Now, that's what I'm talking about! That was a great way to start my Monday morning.

Anonymous said...

How can they know about being born again or their need for deliverance from hell if they don't know God's (moral) Law? The Good News can only be understood by those who know what the "bad" news is (and that they're a part of that "bad").

I do "get" your point, but I'm convinced that I learned about right and wrong from the 10 commandments displayed in my school.

I saw a survey where the young adults could name 10-15 brand names of beers and maybe 2-3 commandments.

So how do you change men's hearts if they see no reason to do so? How did we get to the point where co-habitation (fornication) is an option, where lying is accepted, where stealing is OK because of being disadvantaged, where murder is overlooked because of poor parenting or being temporarily insane?....if there is no "accepted" standard why would anyone feel the necessity to change?

Yeah you're right.....my passion is whooped!

Even So... said...

I think the post answered the concerns it addresssed...

I saw a survey where the young adults could name 10-15 brand names of beers and maybe 2-3 commandments.

They can name the top ten songs on the charts but not name the last ten things they learned at school either...

Sure it stinks, but the problem is larger than that, the problem stems from the failure of the home and failure of the church, governmentalization will not help the problem, only exacerbate it...

What happens when Christians aren't in power, will we have to put the Qur'an up in place of the Ten Commandments?

Even So... said...

So how do you change men's hearts if they see no reason to do so? How did we get to the point where co-habitation (fornication) is an option, where lying is accepted, where stealing is OK because of being disadvantaged, where murder is overlooked because of poor parenting or being temporarily insane?....if there is no "accepted" standard why would anyone feel the necessity to change?

It didn't get that way because we took out the Ten Commandments, and it won't get back by putting them back in...

The standard is to be held up, not by placards, but by standard bearers...

Even So... said...

How can they know about being born again or their need for deliverance from hell if they don't know God's (moral) Law?

It is not the duty of secular education to do that...

The loss of the Ten Commandments was not the cause of the moral decay, it was evidence of it, it was symptomatic of it, it reflected what was already going on...putting them back won't cure the decay, just as pulling them out was not the cause...

Putting a bandaid on cancer won't heal it...

Anonymous said...

Yes, I'll grant you the standard bearers have that responsibility (even though too many IMHO are too wishy washy/nebulous). But I don't think that means we have to exclude the placards! Maybe the placards could have an influence on those whose homes are a mess and don't have access to a "real deal" church!

Yeah, I know, I'm being argumentative! I just know how those placards helped me.

Anonymous said...

Hey, JD, Did you ever imagine a time in this country where things would get better? By "better" I mean the results of Christ's influancing as more of a whole? Or are we looking at a total decay as the time grows near? We were reading about the coming signs that Christ was giving last week in Luke. I... I guess my question is, where or what is concidered the "Judea" in Luke 21:21?
I know this is not staying much with your post but reading your post brought this to mind as well.
Lord bless brother.

Even So... said...

Judea in Luke 21:21 is just that, Judea, this was Christ foretelling of the destruction of 70 A.D.

Many Jews thought that when Jerusalem was surrounded by the Romans armies, that this was the time the Messiah would come back and deliver them, others realized what Christ had said and fled as he admonsished them to...well over 1 million Jews died in that rampage...

Anonymous said...

Wow, Thanks for the insight JD.
And thanks for Sunday as well.